Multidisciplinary advice on the care of complex patients with nuanced needs
When a patient presents with dyspnea and other symptoms suggestive of pulmonary embolism (PE) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), a host of questions arise:
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Cleveland Clinic approaches the diagnosis and treatment of these complex patients with multidisciplinary teams that include specialists in pulmonary medicine, cardiothoracic surgery, nuclear medicine, interventional radiology, cardiovascular medicine, anesthesiology and critical care medicine.
In the video below, a panel of several such specialists — pulmonologist Gustavo Heresi, MD; cardiothoracic surgeons Nicholas Smedira, MD, MBA, and Michal Tong, MD; interventional radiologist Ihab Haddadin, MD; and vascular medicine specialist John Bartholomew, MD — share their experience and insights relative to the following issues:
Differentiating between PE and CTEPH
Treating subacute PE
Treating acute PE
When to consider CTEPH, including:
Advertisement
Surgical and postoperative management of CTEPH
Due to the complexity of these entities, the optimal management approach for these patients is best decided by a multidisciplinary team. Surgical treatment, in particular, is largely dependent on volume and experience.
Video content: This video is available to watch online.
View video online (https://www.youtube.com/embed/3_6sfzWtTrc?feature=oembed)
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) Diagnosis and Treatment
Advertisement
Advertisement
Lower threshold expanded revascularization candidacy without raising early complication rates
Elevated levels of the gut microbial metabolite predict prevalence and adverse outcomes in community-based study
They generally depend on the mutated gene, clone size and clinical setting
Large analysis adds to evidence that absolute diameter alone may miss vulnerable patients
Procedure places the center among only a handful worldwide to offer the minimally invasive approach
Phase 1 trial shows up to 97% decrease through 48 weeks with good tolerability
Post hoc ALPACA analysis boosts biological rationale for ongoing outcomes trial of lepodisiran
Durability findings propel potential one-time treatment approach to phase 1b testing