Locations:

Heart Transplant: Initial Postoperative Care and Where the Field Is Heading (Podcast)

Insights from an expert cardiologist and a transplant surgeon

The number of heart transplants has increased over the past few years both nationally and at Cleveland Clinic, owing to an expanded supply of donor hearts due to growing prevalence of donation after circulatory death and improved organ preservation technology.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

That means more opportunities to offer heart transplantation to patients in need, and thus more reason for referral for transplant evaluation for potentially appropriate candidates. “Our philosophy about evaluation is ‘the sooner, the better’,” says Cleveland Clinic heart failure cardiologist Sanjeeb Bhattacharya, MD. “Even if a referring cardiologist feels like their heart failure patient is still doing OK, it’s best to have that touch point early on. Hopefully I can tell the patient, ‘You’re doing well; see your cardiologist more frequently and then I can see you maybe once a year or every other year until things get a bit worse, if they do.’ In general, earlier is very much better.”

Referral considerations are just one of the issues explored by Dr. Bhattacharya and his colleague Michael Tong, MD, Director of Cardiac Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, in a recent episode of Cleveland Clinic’s Cardiac Consult podcast. The two physicians begin by discussing best practices in patient care during the first year after transplantation and move on to advancements in transplant-related technologies, organ supply and collaborative care approaches. Along the way they address the following:

  • Tailoring immunosuppression strategies to individual patient risk
  • Post-transplant biopsy and monitoring
  • Vaccinations and infection prophylaxis before and after transplant
  • Advising patients on postoperative activity and return to work
  • Donor pool expansion and technologies for assessing donor hearts for use
  • Advances in LVAD use and transplant allocation
  • Transplant in congenital heart disease patients and other complex cases

Advertisement

Click the podcast player above to listen to the 21-minute episode now or read on for an edited excerpt. Check out more Cardiac Consult episodes at clevelandclinic.org/cardiacconsultpodcast or wherever you get your podcasts.

Excerpt from the podcast

Michael Tong, MD: Another important development is that we’re able to do transplants in more and more complex patients. Patients that we wouldn’t transplant even just 10 years ago are able to be taken on with no real problem now.

One such area that you specialize in are patients with congenital heart conditions, especially those who have reached adulthood and may have had a Fontan procedure early in life. These are patients who are now reaching their 30s and 40s and their Fontan operations are failing. We have been doing transplants in these patients more and more often now, with excellent outcomes. Talk a bit about how we can help provide care for these types of patients.

Sanjeeb Bhattacharya, MD: Yes, this is a patient population that’s increasingly coming. They're in their 20s and 30s, sometimes older, and they are starting to have issues, whether they have single-ventricle physiology and are developing signs of Fontan failure or they have a complex dual-ventricle physiology and start having worsening ventricular function or regurgitation.

Historically, these individuals would not be considered great candidates for transplant because there is a lot going on with these patients, certainly from a medical standpoint and sometimes from social standpoint and other standpoints as well. But we have a very good multidisciplinary team approach — including our surgical colleagues, pediatric surgical colleagues, congenital heart disease colleagues, pediatric cardiologists, social workers, dietitians and others — that has really helped us care for these patients in two key ways. First, by identifying these patients and seeing that we can do something for them, and second by ensuring tailored management of them in the pretransplant, transplant and post-transplant periods.

Advertisement

Related Articles

old man looking pensive with hand on forehead

Balancing Therapy and Quality of Life in Aging Heart Failure Patients

AHA statement details nuanced, evidence-based strategies

robotic surgery platform during an operation in the OR

The Case for TECAB in Qualifying Coronary Revascularization Patients

The benefits of multiarterial grafting are possible without opening the chest

ECMO machine hooked up to a hospital patient

Taking Extracorporeal CPR Beyond the Hospital: Insights From Cleveland Clinic’s Experience

Collaborative citywide initiative reshapes protocols to boost cardiac arrest survival

scan of a blood vessel with white pointing arrow

Myocardial Bridges: Tailoring Care From Simple to Complex Cases

For severe cases, complete unroofing of the bridge is imperative

Black-and-white scan with red and blue highlights

Revising Carotid Duplex Criteria Helped Identify More Treatable Asymptomatic Stenosis

Lower threshold expanded revascularization candidacy without raising early complication rates

human intestines with inset showing gut microbes

TMAO Emerges as a Biomarker for AAA Risk

Elevated levels of the gut microbial metabolite predict prevalence and adverse outcomes in community-based study

physician pointing to a heart model and speaking to a woman

Cardiovascular Implications of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP)

They generally depend on the mutated gene, clone size and clinical setting

cardiac echo and cardiac CT images side by side

Indexed CTA Measures Sharpen Risk Prediction in Ascending Aortopathy

Large analysis adds to evidence that absolute diameter alone may miss vulnerable patients

Ad