October 6, 2017

Low-Intensity Shockwave Therapy in Urology

Is it ready for prime time?


By Daniel Shoskes, MD


Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

As urologists, we have decades of experience with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for breaking apart stones within the body. Today, a related and emerging technology, low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT), is being explored for several other urological applications.

Already used in orthopedics, physical therapy and wound treatment, the small, portable LiSWT device uses energy levels about 10 percent of that used for lithotripsy, producing painless procedures without the need for general or local anesthetic. The device is not yet commercially available in the United States.

LiSWT mechanism of action

LiSWT’s biologic effects include neo-angiogenesis, improved blood flow, tissue remodeling, influx of stem cells and reduction of pain and inflammation.1, 2 Presumed mechanisms of action include neovascularity with improved arterial flow3 and influx of stem cells (assessed in animal models).4

For erectile dysfunction

In urology, the most common and thoroughly studied application of LiSWT is for erectile dysfunction (ED). The original protocol involved treating the penis twice a week for three weeks, repeated after a no-treatment interval of three weeks.5 Improvements were seen in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire scores and in penile arterial blood flow. Effects were confirmed in a double-blind sham-controlled trial4 using modified once-per-week protocols, which are much more practical for patients.6


UroGold 100™ device. Image courtesy of Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC (TRT); Woodstock, Georgia.

In our initial experience administering 3,000 shocks per week for six weeks using the UroGold 100™ device (Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC ; Woodstock, Georgia), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores improved from 11.0 +/- 3.6 to 17.2 +/- 5.2 (p=0.01). SHIM was unchanged in 25 percent of patients, mildly improved in 12.5 percent but not sufficiently for intercourse, and significantly improved with erection sufficient for intercourse in 62.5 percent of patients.

Unlike other on-demand ED therapies, improvement with LiSWT appears durable to at least one year.


In Europe, LiSWT is also commonly used for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) or nonbacterial prostatitis. Typically, the protocol involves once weekly treatments for four weeks. Efficacy was reported at 12 weeks in the first sham-controlled study.7 However, long-term success is variable with one study showing loss of effect at 24 weeks8 and another showing persistence of benefit to one year.9


Understanding patient selection and mechanism of action of LiSWT for CPPS is more problematic. CPPS is a highly heterogeneous syndrome and none of the LiSWT studies to date attempted to clinically phenotype patients. While discussions have included improving prostate blood flow or reducing prostate inflammation, neither is likely an important pain driver for most CPPS patients. We hypothesize that the primary benefit of LiSWT in CPPS is treating pelvic floor spasm and trigger points, both very common in CPPS.10

Pilot study in CPPS

We conducted a pilot study in our clinic of 10 men with CPPS, all of whom had pelvic floor spasm with or without trigger points. Four once-per-week sessions involved treating the perineum with 2,000 shocks per session. Total Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index improved from 27.7 +/- 6.2 to 18.5 +/- 8.2 (p=0.0015). Seven patients had a greater than six-point drop, the accepted threshold for significant symptom improvement. By Global Response Assessment, six patients reported significant improvement, one was somewhat improved and three were unchanged. There were no side effects.

LiSWT is a new technology that has reasonable preliminary data and plausible mechanisms of action in erectile dysfunction and chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Ideal patient selection and treatment course is yet to be determined.


  1. Jung YJ, Park WY, Jeon JH, et al. Outcomes of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shock wave therapy for painful stump neuroma. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014 Aug;38(4):523-533.
  2. Saggini R, Di Stefano A, Saggini A, et al. Clinical application of shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders: part II related to myofascial and nerve apparatus. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2015 Oct-Dec;29(4):771-785.
  3. Vardi Y, Appel B, Kilchevsky A, et al. Does low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy have a physiological effect on erectile function? Short-term results of a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study. J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1769-1775.
  4. Lin G, Reed-Maldonado AB, Wang B, et al. In situ activation of penile progenitor cells with low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy. J Sex Med. 2017 Apr;14(4):493-501.
  5. Gruenwald I, Appel B,Vardi Y. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy–a novel effective treatment for erectile dysfunction in severe ED patients who respond poorly to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. J Sex Med. 2012 Jan;9(1):259-264.
  6. Pelayo-Nieto M, Linden-Castro E, Alias-Melgar A, et al. Linear shock wave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Sep;39(7):456-459.
  7. Zimmermann R, Cumpanas A, Miclea F, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome in males: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Urol. 2009 Sept;56(3):418-424.
  8. Moayednia A, Haghdani S, Khosrawi S, et al. Long-term effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome due to non bacterial prostatitis. J Res Med Sci. 2014 Apr;19(4):293-296.
  9. Al Edwan GM, Muheilan MM, Atta ON. Long-term efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy [ESWT] for treatment of refractory chronic abacterial prostatitis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jan;14:12-17.
  10. Shoskes DA, Berger R, Elmi A, et al. Muscle tenderness in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: the chronic prostatitis cohort study. J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):556-560.

Related Articles

URL_Pavelko_3777858_Urology_Dr. Lundy in Clinic_04-26-23_LDJ
September 28, 2023
Study Suggests Broader Use of Anastrozole for Male Infertility

Findings expand upon earlier data, providing new noninvasive options

Kidney lithotripsy procedure Etracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for remove
September 20, 2023
Novel Approach Shows Efficacy in Fragmenting Kidney Stones

Cleveland Clinic is the first to investigate photonic nanoparticles as a potential kidney stone treatment

23-URL-4036562 CQD 650×450 B
August 10, 2023
Targeted Neoadjuvant Therapy For High-Complexity Cases of Renal Masses in a Solitary Kidney

Management of high-risk RMSK in the pre-and current eras of neoadjuvant therapy

Heart and kidneys
April 5, 2022
Models Using Basic Blood Tests Predict Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery

The multidisciplinary research team reported their findings in JAMA

power of big data. binary code information bit on computer monitor screen display. Led light text number one and zero. blur defocus blue bokeh light. technology graphic design background concepts
March 24, 2022
Machine Learning Is Predicting Outcomes in Patients With Overactive Bladder

Physicians explain findings from a recent study

21-URL-2434259 CQD 650×450
February 8, 2022
Urosymphyseal Fistulas Are Rare and Painful, but Treatable

Study reviews institutional experience

21-URL-2271032 CQD 650×450
December 13, 2021
Mapping Out the Genitourinary Microbiome

Information on the microbiome and urologic pathologies remain relatively limited

Human Urinary System Bladder Anatomy
December 9, 2021
Researchers to Conduct Comprehensive Analysis of the Human Bladder and Ureter

New grant will fund work to map human bladder and ureter at a cellular and molecular level