Locations:
Search IconSearch
June 1, 2018/Cancer/Research

ALLELE: Guiding Glioblastoma Treatment with Tumor Genetics

Individual tumor DNA may be key

Brain research

Despite improvements in surgeries, medical therapies and radiation, the outlook for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains dismal. Patients live an average of just 15 months after being diagnosed with this aggressive brain tumor.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Glioblastoma’s bleak prognosis is due in large part to the heterogeneous nature of the tumor’s DNA. Tumors can often have unique genetic signatures, so what works for one patient may not work for another. Researchers are now exploring whether targeting treatment based on an individual tumor’s DNA could result in better outcomes for patients with GBM.

“We’d like to know the genetic driver of the patient’s tumor before we treat them,” says Manmeet Ahluwalia, MD, Director, Brain Metastasis Research Program, Cleveland Clinic. “The genomics of glioblastoma are varied and if we use targeted therapy that focuses on the genetic alterations of the tumor, the chances of success increase.”

Dr. Ahluwalia and investigators from several leading institutions are part of ALLELE, a new consortium to generate prospective clinical genomics and inform treatment decisions in patients with glioblastoma. The latest data from their work was presented at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting.

Clinical trial with biomarker groups

Patients enrolled in ALLELE undergo extensive genetic testing to determine the feasibility of genotyping their tumors in a timeframe that would support real-time use in clinical trials. So far, the researchers have enrolled 46 patients with GBM at five sites. The median time between surgery and biomarker analysis completion was 51 days, a clinically acceptable timeframe for patients with newly diagnosed GBM. The data will be made publicly available.

Of those 46 patients, 26 with MGMT-unmethylated GBM were subsequently enrolled in INSIGhT, a companion randomized multi-arm trial comparing the standard of care, temozolomide, versus three other experimental adjuvant treatments — CC-115, neratinib or abemaciclib. Predefined biomarker groups EGFR, PI3K and CDK-positive will be evaluated for their ability to predict outcome in each arm.

Advertisement

The first arm is the standard of care arm in which patients receive temozolomide orally on a daily dosing schedule approximately two to three hours before daily radiotherapy. Temozolomide is administered postradiation for up to six cycles (five days/cycle). Radiation occurs for a maximum of 49 days.

In the second arm, patients receive temozolomide orally on a daily dosing schedule approximately two to three hours before daily radiotherapy. Patients receive abemaciclib postradiation at a twice daily oral predetermined dose. Radiation occurs for a maximum of 49 days.

Patients in the third arm receive twice daily oral dosing of CC-115 along with daily radiation for a maximum of 49 days. In the fourth arm, patients receive temozolomide orally on a daily dosing schedule approximately two to three hours before daily radiotherapy. Patients receive neratinib postradiation at a daily oral predetermined dose. Radiation occurs for a maximum of 49 days.

Hope for better outcomes

INSIGhT, which is currently enrolling patients, will look at overall survival in the experimental arms compared with the standard temozolomide arm. It will also look at secondary incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and progression-free survival.

Eligible patients must have evidence that their tumor MGMT promoter is unmethylated and must be immunohistochemically negative for IDH1 R132H mutations. Traditionally, the use of temozolomide is associated with just a one-month survival benefit in these patients. Hence researchers such as Dr. Ahluwalia are hopeful that the tumor-DNA tailored trial may result in improved outcomes. “We are hoping this precision medicine based approach is more likely to be successful compared with treating the whole group with one therapy in a heterogeneous tumor.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Dr. Jack Khouri with patient

A Call to Increase Awareness About AL Amyloidosis

New guidelines empower clinicians with practical diagnostic framework

Dr. Shilpa Gupta and patient
April 30, 2026/Cancer/Tumor Oncology

Bladder Cancer Treatment Takes Key Steps Forward

Pivotal Studies Guide Treatment Decisions in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Dr. Timothy Gilligan
April 27, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Getting Tough Conversations Right in Cancer Care

Reflections from an oncology provider and communications educator on new ASCO Guidelines on Patient-Clinician Communication

p53 mutation illustration
April 22, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Study Holds Promise for Targeting Elusive P53 Gene Mutation

Phase 1 trial outcomes offer encouraging news for developing targeted therapy for solid tumors

Synovial sarcoma cells
April 20, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

T-Cell Receptor Therapy Available for Segment of Population with Synovia Sarcoma

Cleveland Clinic to administer first-of-its-kind T-cell therapy

Dr. Jagadeesh and patient
April 14, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

Bispecific Antibody Shows Deep Remission in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

Heavily pretreated patients experience improved progression-free survival and quality of life with CD20xCD3 therapy

Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy

Case Study: Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Bilateral Mastectomy Improves Outcomes

Innovative procedure reduces scarring, recovery time and nipple sensation

Doctor comforting patient
April 1, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

What Gets in the Way of End-of-Life Care Discussions?

Best practices for supporting patients with honesty and compassion

Ad