December 14, 2016/Orthopaedics/Upper Extremity

Efficacy of Preoperative Aspiration in Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Shoulder

In search of a useful diagnostic tool

16-ort-2501-iannotti-hero-image-650x450pxl

By Joseph P. Iannotti, MD, PhD and Eric Ricchetti, MD

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

With the number of shoulder arthroplasties expected to quadruple in the coming years, the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the shoulder is of great concern to orthopaedic surgeons.

This serious complication of shoulder replacement surgery is associated with poor outcomes, technically difficult revision surgery and increased costs. Accurate diagnosis is crucial to making decisions about treatment, including the decision to proceed with a one- or two-stage revision.

PJI’s indolent, non-specific nature

PJI of the shoulder often presents a diagnostic challenge due to the non-specific clinical presentation and indolent nature of the common infecting organisms, including Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (CNSS). Patients frequently present only with symptoms of pain and stiffness in the shoulder, without other signs of infection.

In addition, standard diagnostic testing, effective in identifying knee and hip PJI, is far less effective in identifying shoulder infection. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) show sensitivities in the 80-90 percent range for PJI in the hip and knee, compared to less than 50 percent in the shoulder.

What about synovial fluid aspiration?

Preoperative synovial fluid aspiration is an important diagnostic test for shoulder PJI, as it provides the opportunity to diagnose infection prior to revision surgery. However, obtaining an adequate fluid sample for testing from the shoulder can be more challenging because of the decreased synovial fluid volumes that are present relative to the hip and knee. Due to this increased difficulty in aspirating the shoulder, limited data is available on its efficacy in diagnosis of shoulder PJI. Our group’s recent study sought to determine the rate of successful preoperative synovial fluid aspiration and its effectiveness in diagnosis of PJI in patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Study design

Our review included 202 cases evaluated for painful shoulder arthroplasty at Cleveland Clinic between January 2009 and February 2015. In 110 cases, a preoperative fluid aspiration was obtained and sent for culture, and 97 of these cases went on to revision arthroplasty surgery. Mean age at the time of surgery was 63.2 years (range, 29-89). We identified all cases of attempted preoperative aspiration to determine the incidence of successful and unsuccessful aspiration. Preoperative synovial fluid culture results were then compared to culture results at the time of revision surgery to determine the efficacy of preoperative synovial fluid aspiration for diagnosis of shoulder PJI.

Culture results: preoperative and intraoperative

Aspiration was attempted preoperatively in 137 of the 202 cases (68 percent), and a fluid sample was obtained and sent for culture in 110 of the 137 cases (80 percent). Of the 137 cases, 27 resulted in a dry tap (20 percent). Samples were culture positive in 18 percent of cases (20 of 110), with P. acnes the most commonly isolated organism (11 of 20, 55 percent). Of the cases in which a preoperative aspirate was obtained, 97 proceeded to revision surgery, including 20 with a positive and 77 with a negative preoperative aspirate culture.

Advertisement

Of those who underwent revision surgery, 59 percent (57 of 97) grew positive intraoperative tissue cultures, with P. acnes the most commonly isolated organism (43 of 57, 75 percent). Of the cases with positive preoperative cultures, 16 out of 20 (80 percent) grew positive intraoperative cultures, and the same organism was isolated in 15 of 16 cases. Of the 77 cases with negative preoperative cultures, 41 (53 percent) grew positive intraoperative cultures.

Sensitivity for preoperative aspiration in predicting infection was 26.3 percent and specificity was 87.5 percent, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 2.11 (0.83, 5.32) and 0.84 (0.69, 1.02), respectively. Preoperative aspiration had a 75 percent positive predictive value and a 45.5 percent negative predictive value.

16-ort-2501-iannotti-inset-image-650pxl-width

Diagnostic test characteristics for preoperative synovial fluid aspiration as a predictor of shoulder PJI using a definition of PJI based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, with two or more positive intraoperative cultures of the same organism representing infection.

Seventy-five percent (15 of 20) of patients with positive preoperative aspirates had more than 50 percent of their intraoperative cultures turn positive (average percent positive = 70) compared to 34 percent (26 of 77) in those cases with negative preoperative aspirates (average percent positive = 36) (p = 0.002).

Is preoperative aspiration a useful diagnostic tool in the shoulder?

In this study, we found that obtaining a preoperative aspiration sample for analysis was possible in the majority of patients (80 percent successful aspiration), and a culture positive sample was highly specific (87.5 percent) for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI. Having a positive preoperative culture was predictive of obtaining a positive intraoperative culture, with the same organism being identified 94 percent of the time, and was significantly associated with having more than 50 percent positive intraoperative cultures.

Advertisement

The timing of diagnosis of PJI can be important in determining management of this complex complication. When PJI is identified prior to or at the time of revision surgery, it can significantly impact treatment decision-making.


Dr. Iannotti (iannotj@ccf.org; 216.445.515) is Chair of the Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute.

Dr. Ricchetti (ricchee@ccf.org; 216.445.6915) is staff in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Related Articles

ORI_Viars_4102672_Hand Surgery Bootcamp – Dr. Styron_08-18-23
December 21, 2023/Orthopaedics/Upper Extremity
Boot Camp Prepares Trainees for Hand Surgery Fellowships

Cleveland Clinic specialists offer annual refresher on upper extremity fundamentals

22-ORI-3183860 CQD 650×450
November 1, 2023/Orthopaedics/Upper Extremity
Pollicization or Reconstruction? Managing Congenital Thumb Hypoplasia

Latest concepts in the surgical creation of functional, opposable thumbs in early childhood

23-ORI-4143760 CQD 650×450
September 14, 2023/Orthopaedics/Upper Extremity
Tendon Retraction Indicates ‘Failure With Continuity’ Is Common After Rotator Cuff Repair

CT imaging using radiopaque markers can help assess healing after surgery

23-ORI-3860256 CQD 650×450
Case Study: Persistent Humeral Nonunion Treated With Vascularized Fibular Graft (Video)

Finally, a solution after multiple revision surgeries for delayed bone healing, loose hardware and unrelenting infection

23-ORI-3860257 CQD 650×450
Case Study: Overcoming Glenoid Bone Loss in Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (Video)

Iliac crest structural autograft repairs large, uncontained defect

19-ORT-1461-Patient-Data-CQD-Hero
December 18, 2019/Orthopaedics/Upper Extremity
How Patient Data Are Driving a New Paradigm in Orthopaedic Care

Data system aims to improve orthopaedic care and drive down healthcare costs

Ad