October 1, 2015/Cancer/Research

Encouraging Results in Intraoperative Radiation Therapy Use

An alternative to external beam whole-breast irradiation

grobmyer_690x380

The use of single-dose intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in conjunction with breast conservation surgery, as an alternative to traditional postsurgical external beam whole-breast irradiation, is increasing.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Partial breast radiation’s goal is to limit exposure in selected early-stage patients whose tumors are less aggressive and confined to a single breast segment. TARGIT-A, an international randomized trial comparing a single IORT dose given at the time of lumpectomy to standard radiation therapy given over several weeks after lumpectomy, found that five-year local breast cancer recurrence rates and breast cancer mortality rates were similar for the two modalities. Mortality from other causes was significantly lower with IORT, due to fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes and other cancers.

Need for North American Data

While TARGIT-A’s cohort of 3,451 patients represented 11 countries, less than 10 percent were from North America. Little is currently known about IORT’s frequency of use in North America, the types of patients who receive it and, most important, the therapy’s outcome. While the Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy United States (TARGIT-US) Registry Trial is currently being conducted to address questions of long-term efficacy and toxicity, the results of this prospective study will not be available for years.

Cleveland Clinic researchers organized the retrospective TARGIT-R trial to provide an interim snapshot of IORT usage and outcomes, using data from patients treated at selected North American institutions prior to July 2013. Stephanie Valente, DO, a breast surgeon with Cleveland Clinic’s Comprehensive Breast Cancer Program, presented results of the initial TARGIT-R analysis at the 2015 Society for Surgical Oncology meeting. This is the first large-scale evaluation of IORT for breast cancer treatment in North America.

Nineteen institutions, representing academic and community practices, submitted data involving 1,086 women treated with lumpectomy and IORT between 2007 and 2013. The analysis included 1,050 of those patients who had at least six months of follow-up. Their median age was 67. Most of the women had estrogen receptor-positive (91 percent), invasive ductal carcinoma (69 percent), with tumor less than 2 cm in size (86 percent), and were lymph node negative (89 percent).

Most patients (80 percent) received primary IORT (performed at initial lumpectomy); 7 percent received IORT as a secondary procedure and 13 percent as a planned boost. Almost 19 percent of patients who had primary IORT went on to receive external beam radiation. Complications included seroma requiring aspiration (8 percent), hematoma (1 percent) and infection requiring intravenous antibiotics (2.6 percent).

Median follow-up time was 12 months. The crude local in-breast recurrence rate was 1.6 percent, and regional nodal recurrence was 0.2 percent.

Confirming Value in Appropriate Patients

“Our early results from the TARGIT-R registry basically mirror TARGIT-A’s results and confirm that recurrence rates are low in properly selected patients,” says study co-author Stephen Grobmyer, MD, Director of Surgical Breast Oncology and Co-Director of Cleveland Clinic’s Comprehensive Breast Cancer Program.

Advertisement

With the preliminary findings, “we now have a portrait of who’s being treated with IORT in North America,” says Dr. Grobmyer, who is a member of the TARGIT-US steering committee. “Physicians are being very conservative. They’re treating hormone-positive patients with smaller tumors and patients whose average age is 67 ‒ not the younger patients who tend to have more aggressive disease.

“Selecting less aggressive treatments for less aggressive disease is appropriate, and better for patients,” Dr. Grobmyer says. “Patients like IORT because treatment duration is shorter, side effects are less and they’re able to quickly return to normal functioning. We present it as an option for properly selected patients.”

Young Women’s Breast Cancer Clinic

SERVICES

Genetic counseling to review screening options, and genetic testing to detect alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or other genes associated with increased breast cancer risk, which may enable management targeted to specific mutations

A thrice-weekly clinic with coordinated medical, surgical, radiology and related consultation appointments, to accelerate treatment time and reduce return visits

Dedicated pathology and imaging specialists who deal exclusively with breast diagnostic issues

Access to the latest strategies for fertility preservation and assisted reproduction, including ovarian cycling suppression during chemotherapy; oocyte, embryo and ovarian tissue harvesting and cryopreservation; and in vitro fertilization

Advertisement

Advanced surgical options for breast conservation, reconstruction and lymphedema reduction, including nipple-sparing mastectomy; single-stage mastectomy and breast implant insertion; and vascularized lymph node flap transfer

Single-dose intraoperative radiation therapy for appropriate patients

Access to a wide array of clinical trials, including areas of research with particular impact on young breast cancer patients

Support groups and other psychological and lifestyle counseling and therapy intended for young breast cancer patients

Related Articles

Doctors working on MGUS screening study
March 18, 2024/Cancer/Research
Pilot Study Aims for Early Identification of Multiple Myeloma Precursor Among Black Patients

First-of-its-kind research investigates the viability of standard screening to reduce the burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses

Physician with patient
March 6, 2024/Cancer/Research
Targeting Uncontrolled Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera with Rusfertide

Study demonstrates ability to reduce patients’ reliance on phlebotomies to stabilize hematocrit levels

Doctor measuring patient's waist size
February 26, 2024/Cancer/Research
Impact of Obesity on GVHD & Transplant Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies

Findings highlight an association between obesity and an increased incidence of moderate-severe disease

Physician with patient
February 21, 2024/Cancer/Research
Strategies for Improving Clinical Trial Equity

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute takes multi-faceted approach to increasing clinical trial access

How antibody drug conjugates work
February 13, 2024/Cancer/Research
Real-World Use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Key learnings from DESTINY trials

24-CNR-4545611-CQD-Podcast-967×544
February 1, 2024/Cancer/Research
Possibilities of CRISPR Technology (Podcast)

Gene editing technology offers promise for treating multiple myeloma and other hematologic malignancies, as well as solid tumors

Disparities in multiple myeloma
January 25, 2024/Cancer/Research
Major Study Identifies Global Disparities in Drug Toxicity for Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Study of 401,576 patients reveals differences in cancer burdens as well as overall survival

Dr. Shilpa Gupta
December 27, 2023/Cancer/Research
A New Standard Emerges in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Decades of First-Line Chemotherapy

Enfortumab plus pembrolizumab reduced risk of death by 53% compared with platinum-based chemotherapy

Ad