Is Safe Pregnancy Possible in a Woman with Shone’s Complex?

Case shows planning and careful monitoring can overcome high risks

By David Majdalany, MD

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Presentation

A 32-year-old woman with Shone’s complex, Graves’ disease (treated with radioactive iodine in 2004) and obesity (BMI 45 kg/m2) presented to Cleveland Clinic’s Cardio-Obstetrics Clinic at 7 weeks’ gestation. She was born with coarctation of the aorta, a parachute mitral valve and a bicuspid aortic valve. At age 3 years, she had repair of her coarctation of the aorta, which consisted of resection and end-to-end anastomosis. Three months before presentation, she underwent aortic valve balloon valvuloplasty for aortic stenosis. She had an acute mid-to-upper cerebellar cardiovascular accident, presumably from endocarditis, and was treated with antibiotics. No arrhythmias were noted on month-long rhythm monitoring, and testing for hypercoagulable state was unremarkable.

At presentation, she reported no symptoms and no limitations in ordinary activity (NYHA class I).

A Shone’s complex refresher

Shone’s complex, a developmental sequence of abnormalities on the left side of the heart and aorta, has a prevalence of less than 1 percent among adults with congenital heart disease. Its cardinal features are:

  • Supravalvular ring of the left atrium
  • Parachute mitral valve
  • Aortic stenosis
  • Coarctation of the aorta

Partial presentations with just two or three features may occur. Although morbidity in adulthood is low, pregnancy carries a WHO class 3 or 4 rating (relatively or absolutely contraindicated, depending on severity) due to significant risk of severe morbidity or death.

Case continued: Cardiac evaluation

Evaluation of the patient by transthoracic echocardiography revealed moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis and mild aortic regurgitation (peak/mean gradients = 66/35 mmHg) (see Figure 1).

Shrone's complex

Figure 1. Transthoracic echocardiogram at presentation showing moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis by gradients.

Biventricular size and function were preserved, left ventricular hypertrophy was present, and moderately elevated gradients were observed across the parachute mitral valve (peak/mean gradients = 20/8 mmHg [heart rate, 73 bpm]) (Figure 2).

Shrone's complex

Figure 2. Transthoracic echocardiogram at presentation showing moderately elevated gradients across the patient’s parachute mitral valve.

Advertisement

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the aorta (Figure 3) revealed no focal narrowing, aortopathy or enlargement of the mid-ascending aorta.

Shrone's complex

Figure 3. Magnetic resonance angiogram of the patient’s aorta at presentation showing no focal narrowing, aortopathy or mid-ascending aorta enlargement.

Gauging maternal risk

In 2011, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published guidelines on managing cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. The CARPREG risk score, based on the following four predictors, is widely used to estimate risk of a cardiovascular complication and has been validated in several studies:

  • Prior cardiac event (heart failure, TIA, stroke before pregnancy or arrhythmia)
  • Baseline NYHA functional class > II or cyanosis
  • Left heart obstruction (mitral valve area > 2 cm2, aortic valve area < 1.5 cm2, peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient > 30 mmHg by echo)
  • Reduced systemic ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction < 40 percent).

With a point assigned for each predictor present, risk is estimated as follows:

  • 0 point = 5 percent
  • 1 point = 27 percent
  • 1 point = 75 percent

Our patient had at least two points because of her TIA and severe aortic stenosis — as well as mitral stenosis, albeit moderate — putting her at high risk for a cardiovascular complication.

She was counseled on her risks of heart failure and arrhythmias, as well as the possible need for intervention on her aortic valve during the pregnancy. She was further advised about the risks to the fetus, including prematurity, intrauterine grown retardation, low birth weight, mortality, and risk of congenital heart disease. She elected to continue the pregnancy.

Pregnancy management

The patient was followed throughout her pregnancy in Cleveland Clinic’s multidisciplinary Cardio-Obstetrics Clinic. She was seen every four weeks (every two weeks during the third trimester) and had monthly echocardiograms.

Her echocardiogram at 15 weeks’ gestation showed a mild increase in aortic stenosis, with a peak gradient of 86 mmHg (vs. 71 mmHg six weeks earlier) and a mean gradient of 49 mmHg (vs. 44 mmHg earlier). This was not unexpected, given increased plasma volume and cardiac output during pregnancy. Repeat testing throughout the rest of pregnancy showed elevated stable aortic and mitral valve gradients.

Advertisement

Fetal echocardiography at 24 weeks revealed normal fetal cardiac anatomy.

She was diagnosed with gestational diabetes at 30 weeks, which was controlled with diet.

She underwent weekly non-stress testing starting at 32 weeks.

Labor, delivery and postpartum course

Labor was induced at 39 3/7 weeks with oxytocin and misoprostol (to reduce bleeding) with the goal of avoiding hypotension and tachycardia. Latent-phase arrest prompted cesarean section delivery. The healthy baby girl (9 lb, 6 oz) was taken to the well-baby nursery.

The mother was admitted to the ICU after delivery for monitoring. Postpartum hemorrhage was suspected due to vaginal bleeding and a drop in the hemoglobin level on the complete blood count. She received a blood transfusion and was taken to the operating room for dilation and curettage. In total, she received 5 units of packed red blood cells, 1 unit of fresh frozen plasma and 10 units of cryoprecipitate to maintain hemoglobin above 9 g/L.

The mother was monitored in the ICU for 48 hours with no recurrent bleeding and was discharged home on postoperative day 5 with a healthy baby girl. At her six-week obstetric follow-up appointment, the patient was asymptomatic.

Lessons

Limited literature is available for managing pregnancy in women with Shone’s complex. This case illustrates several key points:

  • Ideally, preconception evaluation is needed to inform a patient of the risks of pregnancy and optimize her health if she wishes to pursue one.
  • During pregnancy, regular cardiology visits with serial echocardiography are important for monitoring valvular abnormalities and ventricular function.
  • Pregnancy is high-risk but can be successfully managed by a multidisciplinary team during and after the pregnancy. This team optimally serves to gauge risks and to develop and modify pregnancy, delivery and postdelivery strategies depending on how the patient and fetus are faring on serial evaluations.

Related Articles

intraoperative photo of robotic tracheobronchoplasty
Robotically Assisted Tracheobronchoplasty: A Case Study

Excessive dynamic airway collapse presenting as dyspnea and exercise intolerance in a 67-year-old

22-HVI-2987079 CQD 650&#215;450
Off-Label Endovascular Intervention for Giant Aortic Arch Aneurysm: A Case Study

Necessity breeds innovation when patient doesn’t qualify for standard treatment or trials

22-HVI-3200903 CQD 650&#215;450
Case Study: A Young Man With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy and Uncontrolled VT

After optimized medical and device therapy, is there a role for endocardial-epicardial VT ablation?

22-HVI-2958608-1 650&#215;450
When the Ross Procedure Fails: Fifth Operation Offers Young Man a New Start

Fever and aortic root bleeding two decades post-Ross procedure

21-HVI-2595510_aortic-aneurysm_650x450
Case Study: When Lung Transplant Evaluation Reveals a Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

How to time the interventions, and how to manage anesthesia risks?

21-HVI-2128310-CQD-Complex-Reoperative-Case-Ross-Procedure-H1
The Ross Procedure in a Reoperative Setting: A Case Study

A potentially definitive repair in a young woman with multiple prior surgeries

20-HVI-2029540_Bypass5_Hero
MIDCAB: A Case Study in Its Benefits, Considerations for Patient Selection

Matching the minimally invasive CABG alternative to the right candidates

Ad