Locations:
February 24, 2022/Cancer/Surgical Oncology

New Model Based on CD8 T Cells May Distinguish ICI Responders from Non-Responders in Melanoma

Study finds high levels of a CD8 T-cell subpopulation to be predictive of ICI resistance

3d illustration of a cross-section of a diseased skin with melanoma that enters the bloodstream and lymphatic tract

Using a transcriptomic profile of a unique subpopulation of CD8 T cells from melanoma patients, a group of Cleveland Clinic investigators has developed a predictive model of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy response. The model is capable of distinguishing responders from non-responders with 88% accuracy by analyzing either tumor or peripheral blood CD8 T cells.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The study, published in the Journal of Experimental Medicine, represents a major advance in the management of patients with melanoma.

“This model may become a focused tool to help clinicians predict who and who will not respond to standard-of-care immunotherapies,” explains Brian Gastman, MD, lead investigator and Director of Cleveland Clinic’s Melanoma & High-Risk Skin Cancer Program. “This allows us to pivot treatment to the growing myriad of options being introduced to the field. Further studies will reveal whether this model can be used dynamically to reflect the changes in patients as they may develop acquired resistance, increasing its utility.”

Lack of predictive tools complicates treatment

The management of metastatic melanoma has changed in recent years, with targeted therapy and immunotherapy completely replacing chemotherapy. Very recent studies now point to the advantage of first-line immunotherapy over targeted therapy for the treatment of advanced disease, Dr. Gastman explains.

“About 45% of our patients are candidates for targeted therapy, but the data clearly shows that immunotherapy is a much more effective way of curing patients when you put the two treatment strategies head to head,” he says. “You’ve got one really good shot with immunotherapy, but if a patient doesn’t respond, you’ve got to figure out what else to do with them.”

Approximately 40% of patients with melanoma will fail to respond to immunotherapy, and the lack of a predictive model of ICI response remains a significant unmet need in this population. Aside from PD-L1 expression, which is used to predict immunotherapy response in lung cancer, smaller studies have analyzed the levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and other blood markers as potential predictors of response. However, none of these attempts have been clinically validated.

Advertisement

“Other than doing imaging, performing a physical exam, and clinically monitoring the patient, there is no effective companion tool to tell us who will or will not do well,” he says.

Taking a closer look at CD8 T cells

Prior studies have shown that TILs, including CD8 T cells, express high levels of ICI receptors, such as PD-1. It has also been established that CD8 T cell tumor infiltration correlates highly with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy response across different cancer types.

Based on earlier comparative studies, Dr. Gastman and his collaborators hypothesized that unique subpopulations of CD8 T cells exist in both the tumor and peripheral blood of patients with melanoma. Therefore, in this latest study, they performed a detailed characterization of CD8 T cells from the tumors and peripheral blood of eight patients with advanced melanoma and employed single-cell transcriptomic analysis to cluster different cell types.

Indeed, the cluster analysis revealed a unique subpopulation of CD8 T cells with high levels of oxidative phosphorylation in peripheral blood and tumor tissue. The authors identified this population as CD8+ TOXPHOS cells.

“We were able to figure out that these CD8 T cells not only exist in the tumor, but that they also exist at a higher level in the blood of patients who were immunotherapy resistant,” Dr. Gastman explains. “We then validated that finding against a number of patient blood samples.”

Following, the team developed a predictive model of ICI therapy response using a transcriptomic profile of CD8+ TOXPHOS cells. The model successfully predicted the ICI response in 11 of 12 patients from the training data set, resulting in a 92% predictive accuracy. It was validated further using three additional data sets, with an overall predictive accuracy of 88%. Interestingly, the model demonstrated 100% accuracy in a small cohort of lung cancer patients.

Advertisement

From therapeutic resistance to therapeutic targeting

According to Dr. Gastman, the implications of these findings could be vast — not only in predicting ICI resistance, but also in the potential therapeutic targeting of CD8+ TOXPHOS cells.

“We discovered multiple potential targetable pathways that are relatively unique to these cells, so we want to leverage their uniqueness to go right after them therapeutically,” he says. “If we can understand the mechanisms that make these cells tick, we can go directly after them to change the course of immunotherapy.”

He notes that several important questions remain to be answered on this path of discovery, including whether these cells cause resistance without any therapy, get generated after ICI treatment, or are part of the resistance mechanism after a patient loses their response.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Patient and doctor
October 9, 2026/Cancer/News & Insight

First Radioligand Therapy Approved for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Adding 177Lu-PSMA-617 to ADT plus an ARPI cut the risk of radiographic progression or mortality by 28%

Woman running
October 7, 2026/Cancer/Patient Support

Pilot Project Aids Cancer Survivors in Achieving Healthy Weight and Reducing Recurrent Risk

New program will help patients improve fitness and manage weight after cancer treatment

Dr Keith McCrae
October 6, 2026/Cancer/Benign Hematology

How is ITP Therapy Evolving?

Cleveland Clinic hematologist highlights new guidelines and treatment advances in immune thrombocytopenia

Bone metastasis
October 5, 2026/Cancer/Innovations

Digital Platform Cuts Bone Metastasis Treatment Decision Time

NIMBLE replaces weekly tumor board delays with same-day multidisciplinary recommendations

Prostate cancer
October 2, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

ArteraAI Prostate Biomarker Accurate Across Diverse Populations

Cleveland Clinic study provides validation for the test, which combines AI and pathological data to predict outcomes in postoperative patients

Prostate cancer illustration
October 1, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

PSMA PET Scan-Guided LDR Brachytherapy Can Control Localized Prostate Cancer Recurrence

Advanced imaging technology catches metastases much earlier, allowing treatment with fewer side effects

Throat cancer
September 30, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

Same Cure Rate, Less Radiation in HPV-Associated Oral Cancer

Reduced radiation for lymph node areas reduces side effects

Lung cancer illustration
September 29, 2026/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

Single-Fraction SBRT Shows Comparable Outcomes to Three-Fraction Approach in Early-Stage Lung Cancer

Large Cleveland Clinic analysis may help resolve a longstanding question over optimal fractionation

Ad