Locations:
Search IconSearch

Rising Syphilis Rates Prompt Study of Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment of Pregnant Patients

False positives and inadequate follow-up care identified as major issues

Oluwatosin Goje, MD

After years of decline, syphilis cases are rising dramatically. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the syphilis infection rate among females aged 15-44 has increased 171.9% since 2016, leading to a 291.1% increase in cases of congenital syphilis. This has serious consequences for infants. They are at increased risk of stillbirth, hydrops fetalis, low birth weight, cardiac and neurological defects, and preterm birth.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

In Northeast Ohio, home of Cleveland Clinic, the syphilis infection rate since 2014 has jumped from 26.4 to 41.7 cases per 100,000 people, with an 82% rise in congenital syphilis from 2016 to 2021. This concerning trend led the Cleveland Clinic Ob/Gyn & Women’s Health Institute and Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases to conduct a comprehensive, retrospective study of women who received perinatal care at the health system’s facilities from 2014 to 2021.

“It’s alarming to see a disease that should be trending down but is instead on the rise,” says Oluwatosin Goje, MD, a Cleveland Clinic obstetrician/gynecologist and Medical Director, Infant & Maternal Health Center. “This is the first rise in congenital syphilis in about 16 years. We analyzed our data to find out if we were doing everything possible to prevent it.”

Syphilis screening methods

Traditional syphilis screening starts with an initial nontreponemal test, such as the rapid plasma regain (RPR) test or Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test. If positive, they are followed by a confirmatory treponemal test. An alternative reverse-screening approach, which Cleveland Clinic adopted in 2014, starts with a treponemal test, such as the syphilis immunoglobin (Ig) G assay or a syphilis total IgM and IgG assay; if positive, this is followed by a nontreponemal test. If there are discordant results, a second treponemal test is administered. Additional testing is required to distinguish true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) results. In many populations, FP results are more common than TP results.

Advertisement

Assessing a large cohort

The study cohort included patients who had 75,056 pregnancies and 77,410 infants delivered from June 2014 through February 2021. Screening was initially recommended for all women at the first prenatal visit and, for high-risk women, again at the early third trimester and at delivery. Starting in July 2019, universal early third trimester rescreening was also recommended as part of the strategy to address the rise in congenital syphilis. The investigators were particularly interested in quantifying the frequency of noncompliance with recommended maternal and neonatal evaluation after an initial positive screen for syphilis.

Many false positives

Positive initial syphilis screens were documented for 221 women (183 FP and 38 TP), for an FP rate of 243.8 cases per 100,000 pregnancies and a TP rate of 50.6 cases per 100,000. Of the total screens, 46 used the traditional algorithm (38 FP and 8 TP) and 175 used the reverse algorithm (145 FP and 30 TP). The FP rate was .83 and was similar for traditional and reverse algorithms. “Sometimes providers may not know how to interpret results and need more information and reminders,” says Dr. Goje.

Of the women with true positive results, 21 (55%) had a past syphilis diagnosis (28 per 100,000) and 17 (45%) had a new diagnosis (22.6 per 100,000). Women with TP and FP screens had different characteristics. Those with TP screens were more likely to be Black, to use marijuana and to have non-syphilis sexually transmitted infections. This validates the need to rescreen patients at high risk for syphilis and other sexually transmitted infections in the third trimester or at delivery.

Advertisement

Inconsistent screening and treatment

Few studies have examined the potential harms associated with syphilis screening during pregnancy, which include the time and expense associated with screening, and FP results that lead to stress, incorrect labeling and further diagnostic workup.

In this study, two women with false positive results and one infant received evaluations and treatments because of concern for syphilis. Two high-risk patients were not rescreened at delivery and were diagnosed after hospital discharge; one infant developed congenital syphilis.

Among 15 TP women with new syphilis, the diagnosis was before the late third trimester in 14. In half of these women, there was concern for reinfection, treatment failure, inadequate treatment or follow-up care or late treatment, and their infants did not achieve an optimal syphilis classification. “The findings reaffirm that we need to do rigorous testing and provide treatment when indicated,” says Dr. Goje.

Updated syphilis screening guidelines

In response to these findings, Cleveland Clinic updated its syphilis screening guidelines for those who are pregnant. The guidelines include:

  • Screening for all as early as the first trimester at the first prenatal care visit, and at 28 weeks gestation.
  • Serologic testing at delivery for patients at risk for developing syphilis during pregnancy.
  • Testing for patients with a fetal death after 20 weeks of gestation.
  • Screening at delivery for anyone who has had no prenatal care.
  • Repeat testing at 28 weeks and at delivery for those with any history of syphilis. Monthly testing should be considered for anyone at especially high risk of reinfection.
  • All infants born to mothers with any syphilis history require testing at delivery, which needs to be compared to the maternal delivery RPR titer.

Advertisement

“When in doubt, providers should reach out to the lab or infectious disease specialist to help interpret the results,” says Dr. Goje. “All pregnant patients should be offered universal testing at least twice during pregnancy to avoid missed opportunities for treatment.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

physicians during surgical coaching training
Building a Coaching Framework for Surgeons

A Q&A with Cara King, DO, MS, on the upleveling power of coaching

woman doing yoga
Rethinking Activity After Pelvic Prolapse Surgery

New guidelines let the patients steer the process

23-WHI-4322159-OGI-CQD-Sustainability-in-OR
Striving for Sustainability in Ob-Gyn Care

Researchers examine waste and implore colleagues to take action

Nurse holding newborn baby
Obstetrics Emergency Department Caters to Unique Needs of Expectant Parents

Specialized unit provides patients with faster, more targeted care

Paternalism in women's health
Commentary: Paternalism in Ob/Gyn Practice

How we create obstacles for sexual, reproductive and menopausal healthcare despite our best intentions

23-NUR-3807622-DoulaProgram-CCIRcommunity-CQD_650x450
Doula Program Improves the Birthing Experience and Patient Outcomes

Nurses and doulas work together to care for expectant moms

Lupus and pregnancy
Preconception Planning is Essential for Patients With Lupus

Disease associated with higher risks for maternal and fetal morbidities

Ad