Locations:
Search IconSearch

SMARCAL1 Identified as a Predisposition Gene for Osteosarcoma

Study also finds that 26% of children with cancer have mutations in DNA repair genes

Osteosarcoma

Researchers have discovered a gene that predisposes patients to osteosarcoma, the bone tumor with the worst prognosis in children and adolescents. The SMARCAL1 gene was among nine genes associated with various cancers in a new study, the first comprehensive assessment of DNA repair genes in pediatric cancers.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

While past studies have explored pathogenic variants in approximately 100 cancer-predisposing genes, this is the first time that pathogenic signals were comprehensively investigated across genes in DNA repair pathways.

“Our study revealed that heritable variants in DNA repair genes are common among children with cancer,” says senior author Richa Sharma, MD, a pediatric hematologist and oncologist at Cleveland Clinic. “Of the 5,993 children with cancer that we studied, 26% had at least one variant in a DNA repair gene.”

Dr. Sharma and a multicenter team of researchers recently published their discovery in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The story behind the study

Why children get cancer has puzzled Dr. Sharma since medical school.

“It’s understandable that adults get cancer, as mutations due to environmental exposures develop over time,” she says. “But children around the world, sometimes as young as days old, don’t have enough time to accumulate the mutational burden to get aggressive cancers, yet are diagnosed with cancer. So, why does a 1-year-old get acute myeloid leukemia? Why does an 11-year-old get a metastatic bone tumor? With my background in basic biology, I thought there must be something predisposing them genetically — maybe heritable deficiencies in DNA repair pathways, which when healthy can function as tumor suppressors.”

During her time at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and after joining Cleveland Clinic in 2025, Dr. Sharma worked with her multicenter team to look for answers in a novel way. Instead of screening a patient population for known cancer-predisposition genes, she “went biology first,” studying conventionally known DNA repair pathways. Specifically, she and collaborators at St. Jude searched for 189 DNA repair genes in the germline exomes of nearly 6,000 children with cancer (median age 6) and more than 14,000 adults without cancer.

Advertisement

Sequencing data from 20,000 controls and cancer patients was a herculean task undertaken by bioinformatics experts, Dr. Sharma says, but the resulting database was the muscle that powered the research team’s big discovery: hits on mutations in nine specific genes in seven specific cancers.

Genes implicated in specific cancers

Germline predisposing variants in five genes identified in the study had previously been associated with cancers:

  • TP53 in adrenocortical carcinoma (12/27, 44%), high-grade glioma (5/206, 2.4%) and medulloblastoma (4/257, 1.6%)
  • PMS2 in high-grade glioma (4/206, 1.9%) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (4/239, 1.7%)
  • MLH1 in high-grade glioma (4/206, 1.9%)
  • BRCA2 in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (5/239, 2.1%)
  • BARD1 in neuroblastoma (6/485, 1.2%)

Four more associations were newly identified:

  • BRCA1 in ependymoma (3/146, 2.1%)
  • SPIDR in high-grade glioma (2/206, 1%)
  • SMC5 in medulloblastoma (4/257, 1.6%)
  • SMARCAL1 in osteosarcoma (6/230, 2.6%)

“Finding the previously known associations helped validate that our analytic bioinformatics pipeline was working,” Dr. Sharma says. “Because we could confirm the link between germline TP53 mutation in high-grade glioma, for example, we could be confident in the novel signals we were finding.”

Of the four genes newly associated with cancers in the discovery cohort, only one validated in all three replication cohorts: SMARCAL1 in osteosarcoma (16/627, 2.6%). BRCA1 in ependymoma and SMC5 in medulloblastoma each validated in one replication cohort.

SMARCAL1 is definitely a cancer predisposition gene for osteosarcoma, but that’s just the beginning of the revelations that we hope to make as we dive deeper into its biologic mechanisms,” Dr. Sharma says.

Advertisement

Clinical implications and future research

Based on this evidence, Dr. Sharma promotes adding SMARCAL1 to the genetic panel used when performing genetic surveillance for families and patients with osteosarcoma. It could lead to earlier detection of disease.

Just as exciting, she says, is using SMARCAL1 as a target for future therapies for osteosarcoma and other cancers. Mutations in the gene have been implicated in other sarcomas and high-grade brain tumors including glioblastoma.

“Although there’s a difference between inheriting versus acquiring a mutation in a gene, the fact that there is a mutation present, in this case in SMARCAL1, implies its importance for tumor biology,” Dr. Sharma says. “By studying the biology of SMARCAL1 and how it drives tumor growth, whether it be from inheriting or acquiring the mutation, we could potentially explore ways of cutting off its oncogenic potential.”

That’s the next step in Dr. Sharma’s research. Her team’s recent study suggests a starting point: All four SMARCAL1-associated osteosarcoma tumors in the replication cohorts had alternative-lengthening of telomeres (ALT). Could ALT be the mechanism encouraged by SMARCAL1 dysfunction, thereby driving growth of osteosarcoma?

“My lab focuses on DNA repair and telomere biology, and SMARCAL1 happens to straddle those two areas,” she says. “This opportunity just landed in my lap. We need to explore it. Yes, discovering that SMARCAL1 dysfunction promotes osteosarcoma is important, but the big deal will be when we uncover how and why.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Illustration of hypophosphototasia symptoms
December 9, 2024/Diabetes & Endocrinology
Collaborative Care for People With Hypophosphatasia

Rare genetic disorder prevents bone mineralization

Spine cancer
September 30, 2024/Cancer/Radiation Oncology
New Study Supports SBRT as Safe, Effective for Osteosarcoma

Research highlights promising outcomes for treating recurrent and metastatic cases

X-ray showing leg bones
March 6, 2024/Orthopaedics/Tumor
The Latest in Limb-Sparing Techniques for Pediatric Patients With Sarcoma

Biologic approaches, growing implants and more

21-CHP-2315658-Hero-650×450
October 6, 2023/Cancer
New Consensus Statement Addresses Early Management of Ewing Sarcoma

Multicenter effort aims to standardize information about diagnosis and early management

23-ORI-3860257 CQD 650×450
Case Study: Overcoming Glenoid Bone Loss in Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (Video)

Iliac crest structural autograft repairs large, uncontained defect

19-EMI-1203-Vitamin-D3-CQD
Vitamin D: A Metabolic Bone Disease Perspective

The many factors that influence 25(OH)D levels add complexity to questions about hypovitaminosis D

22-ORI-2662859 CQD 650x450b
March 18, 2022/Cancer
Team Reconstructs Sternum, Sternoclavicular Joints with a Cadaveric Femur, Aortograft and Ankle-Fixation Cord

Innovative construct restores function after resection of softball-size chondrosarcoma

Provider talks with patient in a clinical setting
Sickle Cell Disease: What Clinicians Need To Know

New course offers insights into clinical, psychosocial and ethical dimensions of care

Ad