Advertisement
What results mean for clinical practice
A team of researchers from Cleveland Clinic and New York University School of Medicine have found that obesity resulted in as much as 47 percent more life-years lost than tobacco, and tobacco caused similar life-years lost as high blood pressure.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Preliminary work presented by Cleveland Clinic at the 2017 Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting analyzed the contribution of modifiable behavioral risk factors to causes-of-death in the U.S. population, using 2014 data.
Based on this preliminary work, the team found the greatest number of preventable life-years lost were due to (in order from greatest to least) obesity, diabetes, tobacco use, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. However, researchers also noted that some individuals may have needs that are very different than those of the broader U.S. population. For an obese and alcoholic patient, for example, alcohol use may be more important to address than obesity, even though obesity has a greater impact on the population.
Results highlight the clinical and public health achievement of smoking cessation efforts because 15 years ago, tobacco would have topped the list.
“Modifiable behavioral risk factors pose a substantial mortality burden in the U.S.,” says Glen Taksler, PhD, internal medicine researcher from Cleveland Clinic and lead author of the study. “These preliminary results continue to highlight the importance of weight loss, diabetes management and healthy eating in the U.S. population.”
A key takeaway is that three (diabetes, hypertension and high cholesterol) of the top five causes of death can be treated, so helping patients understand treatment options and approaches can have a powerful impact on life-years. The results also highlight the importance of preventive care in clinical practice and why it should be a priority for physicians.
Advertisement
To estimate the number of life-years lost to each modifiable risk factor, researchers examined the change in mortality for a series of hypothetical U.S. populations that each eliminated a single risk factor. They compared the results with the change in life-years lost for an “optimal” population that eliminated all modifiable risk factors. Recognizing that some less common factors might place substantial burden on small population subgroups, they also estimated life expectancy gained in individuals with each modifiable risk factor.
“The reality is, while we may know the proximate cause of a patient’s death, for example, breast cancer or heart attack, we don’t always know the contributing factor(s), such as tobacco use, obesity, alcohol and family history,” Dr. Taksler says. “For each major cause of death, we identified a root cause to understand whether there was a way a person could have lived longer.”
Dr. Taksler and colleagues are continuing to conduct research in this area, and analyze and refine results.
Research was presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine 2017 Annual Meeting, “Resilience & Grit: Pursuing Organizational Change & Preventing Burnout in GIM” held April 19-22, 2017, at the Washington Hilton in Washington, D.C.
Advertisement
Advertisement
12 reasons people give for not wanting the influenza vaccine
A guide to informed, team decision-making
Its origins, uses and limitations
Evidence-based guidelines and communication are key
How will the components and uptake of this year’s influenza vaccine impact patient health?
A centennial year update on epidemiology, transmission and treatment of influenza.
Why our answer is ‘no’
It’s safe and accurate, but who should be tested?