Locations:
Search IconSearch

Hyperacusis Research: The Noise is Too Loud!

Animal model sought to understand heightened sensitivity

14-ENT-2021-Kaltenbach-Hero-Image-690x380pxl

By James Kaltenbach, PhD

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Hyperacusis is a condition characterized by a heightened sensitivity to sound that can result in patients having difficulty tolerating many sounds. Those with hyperacusis perceive environmental sounds as being louder and/or more annoying than what normal-hearing people perceive. Sounds that are particularly bothersome include automobile traffic, sirens and other background noise, but even the sounds of other people’s voices or music can create much discomfort. Patients with severe hyperacusis can have such a low tolerance for sound that they confine themselves to quiet rooms.

Our Study of Hyperacusis in a Rodent Model

As is the case with other hearing disorders, the development of effective therapies for hyperacusis will require a better understanding of its mechanisms. To achieve this, establishing an animal model of the chronic form of hyperacusis is necessary. Recently, researchers in Cleveland Clinic’s Auditory Neurobiology Laboratory discovered that animals exposed to intense sound develop long-lasting hyperacusis-like “enhancements” in their responses to noise. These enhancements occurred in two ways:

  • Animals that had been exposed to intense sound were still hypersensitive to noise a few weeks later. This hypersensitivity manifested as a heightened startle response when brief bursts of noise were presented. When we compared measures of the startle amplitude of the sound-exposed animals with those of unexposed control animals, we found a large increase in the amplitude of the startle in the exposed group when the sound pressure level exceeded 105 dB (Figure 1).
  • The exposed animals exhibited an enhanced sensitivity to background noise. The addition of background noise resulted in a suppression of the startle response, as though the animals had become sensitized to background noise. In the normal-hearing animals, the addition of background noise to the startle stimulus had no significant effect on the startle response.

Advertisement

Both types of enhancements were observed over several months of testing, so it appears that the sensitization to noise in the exposed animals represents a chronic condition. Therefore, the question of whether these enhancements do indeed represent a chronic form of hyperacusis is of central importance. The answer may lie in some recent studies of hyperacusis and tinnitus in humans.

A Link to Tinnitus

The causes of hyperacusis are much the same as the causes of tinnitus, with which it is often associated. They include exposure to excessive noise or ototoxic drugs, in addition to other insults that induce injury to the inner ear. Two recent studies are of interest:

  • Dauman and Bouscau-Faure found that the incidence of hyperacusis in patients with tinnitus was almost 80 percent. Based on the strong association, these two disorders are likely interrelated.
  • Fournier and Hébert studied acoustic startle responses in tinnitus patients and found that most of them displayed enhanced startle responses, which were analogous to what we found in our study of sound-exposed animals.

Continued Quest for an Animal Model

Further work will be necessary to verify that an enhanced startle response is a characteristic of humans with hyperacusis, but for now, the parallel is quite striking and gives us reason to persevere with studies of startle in animals. Establishment of an animal model of chronic hyperacusis would move us a step closer to understanding its underlying mechanisms, which is ultimately the key to developing appropriate treatments.

Dr. Kaltenbach (kaltenj@ccf.org) is Director of Otology Research and Head of the Auditory Neurobiology Laboratory in the Head & Neck Institute.

Advertisement

14-ENT-2021-Kaltenbach-Inset-Image-Table-590pxl-width

Figure 1. Graph shows the significant differences (asterisks) in startle amplitudes between the control animals and those exposed to intense sound

Advertisement

Related Articles

Patient working on balance
Dizzy Discourse: Updates in Vestibular Care (Podcast)

How a new clinic is helping to streamline evaluations for patients

Doctor checking patient's throat
Caring for the Professional Voice (Podcast)

A multidisciplinary approach and individualized plan of care are imperative

Tired woman
Advancements in Surgical Intervention for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (Podcast)

Novel procedures provide options for patients who can’t tolerate CPAP

Child being fitted with cochlear implants
The Latest on Pediatric Unilateral Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants (Podcast)

Research on children with UHL explores the quality-of-life benefits and outcomes of cochlear implants

Doctor talking with patient
Mandibular Advancement Devices in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (Podcast)

A look at how custom-fitted oral appliances work and when they’re a good fit for patients

hearing loss
Now Hear This: Perceptions and Research on Hearing Health (Podcast)

Hearing loss and its treatments are often misunderstood by both the public and healthcare professionals

Dysphagia
What is the “Right” Diagnostic Approach for Dysphagia? An Expert Weighs In

Modified Barium Swallow Study and Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing can both be used to diagnose dysphagia, but it’s important to understand their advantages and disadvantages

Ad