When Hearing Is Good but Not Good Enough: Expanding Criteria for Cochlear Implantation

Clinical trial aims to determine whether candidacy should be redefined

14-ENT-2027-Woodson-Hero-Image-690x380pxl

By Erika Woodson, MD, FACS

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The Hearing Implant Program at Cleveland Clinic, which has long been at the forefront of technology for the rehabilitation of advanced hearing loss, is pleased to announce that we will be participating in the latest FDA trial of cochlear implants (CIs) in adults.

The CI422 study will determine whether we can use newer, more challenging test methods to demonstrate that patients benefit from CIs under expanded eligibility criteria (Figure). This study is sponsored by Cochlear Americas, a manufacturer of hearing implant devices.

Why Do We Need New Criteria?

Traditional CI candidacy has been determined by measuring a patient’s sentence comprehension when listening binaurally with optimized hearing aids in both ears. Over time, candidacy tests have evolved from the easier hearing-in-noise tests (HINTs) to the more difficult AzBio test. However, the AzBio test still falls short of measuring hearing handicap in real-world conditions.

The aim of the CI422 study is to determine if additional, more challenging testing is necessary, and if patients who perform “too well” on HINT and AzBio testing may still obtain a greater benefit with a CI than with hearing aids alone. Our findings may ultimately pave the way for patients with significant but not profound hearing loss to qualify for cochlear implantation.

Advertisement

Restoring Hearing at the High Frequencies

The Hearing Implant Program has robust experience with patients whose hearing has traditionally been considered too good for a CI. Many of these patients have a sharply sloping sensorineural hearing loss, with good low-tone thresholds and profound high-frequency deafness. They can hear speech, but they must rely on contextual clues to differentiate words. A CI in these cases restores hearing at the high frequencies, which allows patients to hear much better in a variety of listening situations.

Moreover, we can often save low-frequency hearing in the implanted ear, which allows for better sound localization and music appreciation and even greater listening abilities in the presence of background noise.

14-ENT-2027-Woodson-Inset-Image-Graph-590pxl-width

Figure. Audiometric parameters of the CI422 study. Graph adapted, with permission, from Cochlear Americas.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Pediatric uvular cyst
Case Study: Treating and Managing a Pediatric Uvular Cyst

Prompt surgery was necessary when symptoms drastically increased

Patient scan
Cleveland Clinic Team Achieves Success in Complicated Surgery

Collaborative and multidisciplinary approach necessary for treatment

vestibular testing
Case Study: The Importance of the Vestibular Test Battery Evaluation

When a patient failed to improve, the value of a comprehensive vestibular test was apparent

Gingival fibroma
Mass Under the Lip

Case highlights the importance of oral hygiene in hospital and outpatient settings

Before and after images of patient with trivector trasoral trasfacial OTTT.
Cleveland Clinic Facial Reanimation Surgeons Perform Tri-Vector Reanimation in Pediatric Patient

A team of surgeons helped give a 9-year-old patient with congenital facial paralysis the ability to smile

19-ENT-4148-TongueMass–650×450
Case Study: An Unusual Tongue Mass Raises Questions

Head and neck surgeons discuss the perplexing case

Ad